In a message dated 3/5/2003 11:06:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, Rfsindg writes:

> Mike made some valuable contributions to the list.
> Some people have also taken some of his posts as pompous.
> 
> He hasn't been on this list that long, and when he tells us
> 'the caveman' is a bad guy and a newcomer he's full of it.
> Can he say 'Lens Gallery'?!!!
> 
> Valentine (aka 'the caveman') was here 5 years ago poking fun at Pal's 
> constant posting of 'the new Pentax flagship is just around the corner, I 
> have inside information'.  The flame wars were extraordinary.  And in the 
> meantime, 'the caveman' built a place on the web for all of us to look at 
> examples from various lenses.  Fred Wasti just moved it to a new server this 
> year.  The point is, Valentine is a long-standing member of this list with 
> just as valuable contributions as Mike's.  (He's just been quiet as he moved 
> from a cave in Transilvania to a new place in Canada.  <g> )
> 
> Mike needs to take some time off.  I think he was beginning to view the pdml 
> as his personal email discussion list.  I hope he comes 
> back with a refreshed 
> perspective.
> 
> Regards,  Bob S.

1. He *is* refreshing his viewpoint.

2. Let me reemphasize that I contacted him, he did not contact me.

3. Once I did, he said please pass on this message. So I did.

4. I am a total newbie and am well aware that I am not familiar with who has been on 
the list a long time and who has made contributions in the past, etc. I was on the 
list before Mike rejoined again, so I know he has not been on the list the whole time. 
And I have seen some other people join after me, but other than that, I am clueless.

5. I was trying to ease a situation, not create more friction.

6. I would have preferred, personally, if caveman had not linked in a prick pic to his 
email without saying what it was. It was a bit of a shock, and I am no prude. 
Actually, I would prefer, personally, that *no one* link in "pornographic" photographs 
to any email they send to the list. Or if they do that they state what it is, so I 
don't inadvertently look at something that when I wouldn't really want to look at in 
the first place.

7. I don't know Mike any better than I know the rest of you. I like to stay out of 
personality clashes as much as possible in mailing lists, newsgroups, and muds. But, I 
admit, I often find them extremely annoying and, even, upsetting. Ergo, I sometimes 
have the urge to be a peace maker -- an urge which maybe I shouldn't give into to. But 
sometimes I do.

Other than that, please cut me some slack.

Doe aka Marnie :-)

Reply via email to