Keith, So reply back to her reply with your feelings. At least you would find out if these are purely auto-replies or if there is actually a person on the other end selecting them.
Maybe you could get a response from Canon on the 10D and then send her both replies and ask her which camera she would buy based on company response... Bruce Thursday, March 6, 2003, 4:27:51 AM, you wrote: KW> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> > On 5 Mar 2003 at 17:25, Keith Whaley wrote: >> > >> > > Her answer sounds like the camera was being made FOR Pentax to >> > > distribute and sell ~ not that it was designed and manufactured for >> > > sale by Pentax... Hmmm. Very interesting. One can read a lot into that >> > > non-answer. >> > Maybe they just don't know, they probably haven't been briefed beyond what we >> > can all read on the press release. >> Seemed to me like an automatic response without reading the >> question. KW> Perhaps so, but it's also likely the response came from a series of KW> pre-prepared answers, leaving the person who did answer little choice KW> but to select the least obnoxious one possible. KW> On the other hand, such a response from the U.S. national arm for KW> public relations for a world-wide company shows a decided lack of KW> caring what sort of answer is given, nor what the customer thinks KW> about that answer. KW> No thought given at all. KW> It's that 'don't really care' attitude that is appalling to me... KW> And most folks just say, "Oh well." As tho' they've seen this stuff so KW> often, one more non-answer is par for the course. So, no one speaks up. KW> Maybe so, but that lack of caring ought to bite 'em on the butt once KW> in a while. KW> keith whaley
