i didn't say there weren't any tests. i wanted to see which specific tests were used to justify the original claims. as expected, they were for a set of circumstances that are basically achievable only in a lab.
Herb... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lukasz Kacperczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 20:10 Subject: Re: AF vs. MF [was: Re: Bessaflex in M42 mount] > Sure. But that's why there are things like "field tests". I think the main > point is that in something close to laboratory environment AF is worse than > MF, but in practice it may be faster and more reliable than MF. And I agree > with that. I only opposed your claim that this is no way to conduct such a > test. We have to remember that there are tests and there are tests.
