Jostein wrote: > > I agree with Henry that the pixel structure looks bad when viewed at > >400%, but the tones in the pixels all together, eg. in the girl's > face, are all pretty close to each other. No pixels with stray > colours. > > However, I think the camera soft/firmware has room for improvement > when it comes to smoothening the tonal gradations between pixels. I > don't think the colour depth is an issue here, only the distribution > of tones. For all I know, this might be possible to amend with a > soft/firmware upgrade. > > Given the peculiar sliding lens construction, I'm more worried about > the obvious chromatic aberrations in the upper left corner of the > image.
Your points are well taken. - keith > Jostein > > Btw, I use a 19" Eizo monitor at 1280x1024 and 32 bit colour. It's > calibrated with Adobe Gamma loader.
