Hi I thought the 2.5/135mm was a M lens? I never thought of the 3.5, but I guess it's cheaper come by. And - you're right - I should sell the A 135m... Thanks Jens
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 21. marts 2003 21:18 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: SMC M 2.5/135mm >Hi all >I'm considering buying this lens again (I lost the one I had and I thought >it was great). Do any of you know this lens better that the SMC A 2.8/135mm, >which I allready own? >Thanks >Jens Jens, are you talking about the M 135mm 3.5 or the K 135mm 2.5? But anyway, they are both better than the A 135mm. You could sell the A to buy the more expensive K lens (not a lot more expensive). If you want a light lens (hiking etc.), go for the M and you'll still have some money in the pocket. Andre --
