Thanks Bruce, the shots look good to me! JOOC, what does PGI stand for? Sorry I'm technically-challenged.
Based on your comment, would you say that it shows similiar characteristics to the VC160, when you make enlargements? Thanks again for everyone's help! --- Bruce Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The first 5 shots here: > http://home.att.net/~b_rubenstein/Fred/index.html > were done with UC. The rest are Fuji 400. I'm not > sure what you can tell > by looking at smallish files on a monitor. Prints > done on Royal Kodak > paper look really good. The film has the same PGI as > VC160 which is > lower than the other 400 Portra films. > > BR > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Bruce: > > > >Do you (or anyone else here on the list) have > sample > >photos that I could look at, where you used Kodak > >Portra 400UC? I'm curious to see the colors, > >especially with skin tones. I have not shot it > yet, > >and would appreciate a sneak peak before buying > some. > > > >Thanks for the referral to Kodak-looks like a good > >deal to me! > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com
