BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Bruce,
the shots look good to me! JOOC, what does PGI stand for? Sorry I'm technically-challenged.
Based on your comment, would you say that it shows similiar characteristics to the VC160, when you make enlargements?
Thanks again for everyone's help!
--- Bruce Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The first 5 shots here:
http://home.att.net/~b_rubenstein/Fred/index.html
were done with UC. The rest are Fuji 400. I'm not
sure what you can tell by looking at smallish files on a monitor. Prints
done on Royal Kodak paper look really good. The film has the same PGI as
VC160 which is lower than the other 400 Portra films.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce:sample
Do you (or anyone else here on the list) have
photos that I could look at, where you used Kodakyet,
Portra 400UC? I'm curious to see the colors,
especially with skin tones. I have not shot it
and would appreciate a sneak peak before buyingsome.
Thanks for the referral to Kodak-looks like a good deal to me!
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com

