On March 27, 2003 12:54 pm, Mishka wrote:
> jco,
> the subject states "35mm SUCKS!". i disagree.
> 4x5 is a *special purpose* tool, and as such it is wonderful. it's like
> saying that 50mm lens sucks since 1000mm allows for better quality of far
> away detail, or that honda civic sucks since any formula-1 car is faster.
> btw, 4x5 definitely sucks since 10x12 blows it away quality-wise, doesn't
> it?
> this very much pointless, anyway -- for *what you are doing* 4x5 is better,
> you are excited about it and i am happy that you share your excitement.
>
Nah 35mm is the special purpose tool. Other then the few things that need
the speed of 35mm bigger is better-)))
Nick
