Dick Graham forwarded this from his brother:

> Hi Dick, 
> Our Pentax rep brought an MZ-S in last week. The one thing that 
> overshadows all else about the camera is it's price.
> With a street price of $850 to $900, it will not sell very well.
> We figure, based on feel and features, it should be priced at about 
> $600. The interface is cumbersome. Focus point sellection is very 
> cumbersome. ... But more important than any of the above, dispite 
> it's magnesium construction, it feels cheap. I fear that Pentax has 
> dropped the ball on this one. We'll see. If the price gets down 
> around $500 to $600 it may succeed.

Hard words.

Besides the fact that Bill didn't understand the exposure mode 
interface of the camera (somehow a bad thing in case this happens to 
dealers), I think this is how the non Pentax fans will see the 
camera. Especially since these complains are independent from 
technical features (no cross sensors, only 2.5 fps, 1/180s synch, no 
program shift, only 0.5EV exposure comp., no flash compensation 
in program with RTF and so on and so on), it is a very bad sign that 
they can't appraise the camera in a clear way. Some European Pentax 
distributors have also noted that the camera uses a lot of plastic. 
In other words: If you can't immediately feel the $1200.-, and you 
can't see them in the specs too, who would spend them, in case he is 
not a die hard Pentax fan?

Unfortunately I see little chances that Pentax can lower the price. 
That's a volume question. Technical updates on the other side are 
difficult or impossible due to the small body. So we have to live 
with the situation that Pentax has released a camera targeted 
direct at the Pentax fan, a camera that makes sense in the special 
situation of an advanced Pentax system user, while being not the big 
draft for the overall market.

Ralf
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to