Apologies all around. I was being too literal again! Sighhh.
I see [now] that it's a compound word made up from aster{isk] and ist. Duh!
For the first time in years, I've found a use for "duh!" <g>
keith
Keith Whaley wrote:
>
> No, it wouldn't. It would be asterisk-ist.
> There is no such word as "asterist" in spite of several trying their own
> spellings of it...
>
> keith whaley
>
> T Rittenhouse wrote:
> >
> > Would not that be, Asterist-Ist?
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Graywolf
> > http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > The Canadian reps are calling it an Asterist.
