Re: Cost of cameras (WAS Re: Lens Mount Progress)

[Caveman]

The LX had a unique feature that no other camera (on the shelves at that 
time) had. The MZ-S doesn't.

mike wilson wrote:
Hi,

Many people have been saying that the MZ-S is expensive.  So it is.  To
put it in perspective, maybe, just note that the LX cost, at one point
in the UK �1600 - body only.  That would be about 10 years ago.
About a year before it was discontinued this was reduced to just over
�700.  About the cost of the MZ-S now.