people are already paying thousands for inkjet prints today, and that is not even for the really well known photographers. i know two photographic acquaintances who are nearly exclusively in the fine art market, one selling prints from 35mm and one selling prints from 4x5. they will never go back to silver halide prints. i can assure you that they are successfully making a living selling inkjet prints of their work at up to several thousand dollars a print.
Herb.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 22:18 Subject: Re: Is an inkjet print a photograph? > Nor do I > think a knowledgeable collector is going to pay big bucks for an inkjet > print like he would for a photographic print. As a matter of fact, I don't > believe you would either. Or if I am wrong, could I interest you in an > inkjet print of Moon Over Halfdome? Come on, only a thousand bucks, I will > download it off the internet tonight, and print it up just for you.
