At 09:33 PM 6/20/2003 -0500, Ed Matthew wrote:
I make Ilfochromes, and both fiber-based and RC monochromes. However I have no problem with calling an inkjet print a photographic print.
...and <grin> I see no problem with your refusal to accept inkjet prints as 'photographic prints'.
As Dickens once put it - "It's a wonder you don't run for Parliament!"
=:-0
MCC - - - - - - - - - - Mark Cassino
<G> I might first have to break in via the Indiana state legislature - not an appealing thought.
BTW, your Michigan lighthouses would be excellent even if they became non-photographic prints by being printed on non-photographic inkjet paper via a non- light sensitized computer by a non-photographer working in a non-darkroom.
I sent your link to some lighthouse enthusiasts in our photography club. They may choose to change to a different favorite subject.
Regards, Ed
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
