This thread reminds me of discussions I had back in the 70's when I was just getting seriously into photography. Only then it was; is available (existing) light B&W photography the only true photography? Any time there is a major change there will be those who question the inclusion of the change into the old definition. I personally have no problem calling an image that I shot on film, had the negative scanned, and printed on my ink jet, a photograph. It is also an ink jet print, a print, and an image. I also have no problem with the above definition if the capture method is a digital camera, and would define a photograph in its broadest terms as an image captured by a camera.
BUTCH Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself. Hermann Hess (Demian)
