Guys It's not digital OR film. Like it's not train OR car OR ship OR busses.... It's film AND CCD's. Nothing's odd about that. Each media has it's advantages. Use the media that fits each situation and assignment the best. Isn't that quite obvious? Jens
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 27. juni 2003 19:52 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: Digital vs. film again (was Re: I Am Pissed!) > -----Original Message----- > From: Caveman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > tom wrote: > > > No, it won't. > > Have you actually done it ? I had my own darkroon for 4 years. I made thousands of prints. I've done everything. Do you think I'm so stupid as to ditch an entire system for crappy prints? > > > You really should limit your comments to something you know about. > > See above. No, I think you need to take a breath. Do you shoot medium format regularly? Do you shoot digital regularly? Have you made prints of various sizes from both? Do you print both b/w and color? Have you compared 35mm, 645, 67 and DSLR prints side by side? Have you actually even seen any competently made prints from a DSLR? Do you really think I'd switch from 645 to digital if the prints sucked? Do you have any idea what a stickler I am? For 3 years I printed EVERY b/w print that went out my door because I couldn't find anyone who printed to my standards. You regularly make snide and derisive comments about anything having to do with digital. Personally, I find your attitude annoying, and your opinions ignorant. tv
