It depends were they bought used, (after all used lenses are cheap didn't you know that)? ;->

At 05:24 PM 6/27/03 -0400, you wrote:
With Lcica, $10,000 worth of lenses isn't all that many lenses...

cheers,
frank

Jens Bladt wrote:

> Hi Aren't you forgetting, that the body may be the least of the total
> investment - I mean if you have like 10.000$ woth of lenses etc. matching
> this body and mount?
> Jens
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Mike Ignatiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sendt: 26. juni 2003 15:18
> Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Emne: Re: Leica R9/R8 digital back
>
> buy a better back ($4500) without having to change your SLR ($1000)?
> is it me or does it sound like "buy a better camera without having to change
> neck-strap"?
>
> mishka
>
> > From: "whickersworld"
> > Subject: Re: Leica R9/R8 digital back
> >
> > I think you've completely overlooked the enormous
> > benefit of using a digital back with a film SLR.
> > That is, when the digital technology improves, you
> > can buy a better back without having to change your
> > SLR.


--
"What a senseless waste of human life"
-The Customer in Monty Python's Cheese Shop sketch

To grasp the true meaning of socialism, imagine a world where everything is designed by
the post office, even the sleaze.
O'Rourke, P.J.




Reply via email to