>> Digital! Digital! Digital! > >Sorry Cotty. I've already stated my pov: "It's about adequacy of a >certain workflow to certain situations. The digital one fits very well >for some purposes." I'll just add that film suits very well some >purposes too.
Dahhhh. Let's not let the facts get in the way here. Workflow shmerkflow. Like you, I too believe that it's horses for courses. Unlike you, I go with my heart. Look at the pictures, use your own eyes and see the results. Compare and admire. At the end of the day it's about what works for each person, but come on - don't knock what you have simply not experienced yourself. >If you didn't notice, it was about *image reconstruction* in digital vs. >film, not about "which is better" of digital vs. film. I didn't notice. Digital! Digital! Digital! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________ Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
