Although I have a Pentax Optio 230, and a Canon Pro 90 IS, my first love is still slide photography. I have found myself moving back to shooting more film than digital. I'm not even tempted to photograph a scene digitally before doing it on film. After the *istD comes out I suggest pdml split up into digital and film since so a Pentax user of film or digital won't have to wade through the list looking for a subject that relevant to what type of photography interests them.
Jim A. > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 23:49:03 +0100 > To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Digital vs. film again (was Re: I Am Pissed!) > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:50:13 -0400 > >>> Digital! Digital! Digital! >> >> Sorry Cotty. I've already stated my pov: "It's about adequacy of a >> certain workflow to certain situations. The digital one fits very well >> for some purposes." I'll just add that film suits very well some >> purposes too. > > > Dahhhh. Let's not let the facts get in the way here. Workflow shmerkflow. > Like you, I too believe that it's horses for courses. Unlike you, I go > with my heart. Look at the pictures, use your own eyes and see the > results. Compare and admire. At the end of the day it's about what works > for each person, but come on - don't knock what you have simply not > experienced yourself. > >> If you didn't notice, it was about *image reconstruction* in digital vs. >> film, not about "which is better" of digital vs. film. > > I didn't notice. Digital! Digital! Digital! > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps > _____________________________ > Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk >
