I must confess, I have been guilty of just what the mighty Dougster is saying. I am so pissed off at Pentax for all of the reasons I have been bitching about over the last several years (no DSLR, no 'Limited' camera, no IS, no USM, no aperture wheel or grip-strap on the otherwise gorgeous MZ-S, perhaps the prettiest camera ever produced, no 80-200 f4, etc.). But judging from recent postings, I (we) are not alone. Nikon users are whining about them being behind technologically, as well. And it is not entirely true that some of this hi-tech stuff would not make you a better photographer; image stabilization would help everyone almost immediately, if it could be done with minimal optical aberrations.

So I bitch and whine for a while, and vent my frustrations on this list, and then I do a shoot for the plastic surgeon with the magnificent 24mm f=2, and all is well again. Or, more recently, I did a shoot for Cap's Bikes, primarily with the 85mm f=1.4, and oh, man, I just can't believe that lens. I cannot believe anyone could make a finer lens, period. It is so beautiful, I couldn't bear to part with it for some horrible Canon zoom with IS, but with severe distortion at both ends. The 85 and the 24 are the reasons I still sing Pentax's praises in public, but whine about them here.

If they can make things of such exceptional beauty and quality, why can't they release the damn 'flagship', or update the MZ-S with an aperture wheel? And a full-frame MZ-D. Remember when we thought they were going to produce that beauty?

After getting my shots back from the Cap's shoot, I must say I still believe in Pentax. I hope my PZ-1 lasts forever. BTW, I also got some magnificent shots with the FA* 28-70 f=2.8, a highly underrated optic, and I used the Powerzoom feature for mountain bike action shots with a local semi-pro mountain biker going at 40 MPH through the trails out at UBC. I will miss powerzoom when it is finally gone from my system; it is too bad it never caught on. It really is great for image size tracking.

Cameron

Reply via email to