1. Ruggedized, especially the film advance, and the meter circuits (proven weak points). 2. Better sealing, actually a lot better sealing. 3. Adjustable viewfinder diopter, this is an add on due to age (mine).
That would make it perfect from my point of view, but I notice that many folks would like mirror lock up as well. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Skofteland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:46 PM Subject: Re: On cheerleading > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ><SNIP praise for the MX> > > In the late 60's I came up with what I would > > call my ideal camera. The MX when it came out was virtually that dream > > camera, there are only a couple of things I would change if I could have > > them built to my specifications. > > > > Ciao, > > Graywolf > > http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto > > > > I think the MX is a jewel of a camera too. At one point I had 4; now I'm > down to one in extraordinary condition. Just what would you "improve" upon? > > Christian >
