Cameron
On Saturday, August 9, 2003, at 08:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 14:05:26 +0100 From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: *ist D is bloody small! Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
OK, Cotty, I will bite. How much money have you actually lost on the D60?
None what-so-ever, I'll bet.
I'll bet he profited based solely on savings of film purchase/processing
costs?
I've shot roughly 5000 frames in nearly a year (actually 5500 but say
5000 to allow for wasteage/testing/mistakes), so lesse, 5000 divided by
36 is say 138 rolls at �2 per roll (Fuji Superia 200 neg) plus �2.50 dev
only, that's �4.50 per roll, so 138 X �4.50 is �621 saved on film
otherwise bought, so not quite a profit.
OTOH I would not have spent so much on film in the same time frame, maybe
about half. So you could say that I've doubled my picture-taking with
digital, at no extra cost?
Then there is the cost of printer inks (except that with film I was
scanning and printing as well), which for a full set of Canon S9000 inks
is about �40, and paper etc. Obviously I don't print everything (!), in
fact only a fraction, about 20 or 30 A4s and A3s a month, some get
framed, some are presents, some just for the hell of it. Most stuff goes
on the web site.
HTH
Cheers, Cotty

