Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Mark Roberts wrote: > >> Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >May I disagree a little bit[1] about the quality of the picture in >> >question? It may of course be the quality of my screen, but it seems >> >to me that the whiter of the grey rocks are dithered crudely, they >> >definition of their shapes is just rough (yes, I know the rocks were >> >rough :-), >> >> Yep, that's exactly how they appear in film shots of the same scene. It >> looks like digital pixelization but it isn't; the rocks really look like >> that. I almost didn't use that particular photo for that reason. > >Many thanks for this. Can you also see the white artifacts in the >bushes?
They're blown-out highlights which have been exaggerated somewhat by unsharp masking. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
