John wrote: JF> but I seem to recall that the 80-320 was well received when it was JF> first released, so I'm thinking of trying one with the *ist-D
John, considering the 60 lpmm requirement of the *ist d sensor, the 80-320 will behave remarkably well between 80 and 135, still well at 200 mm, but I'm afraid it'll fail miserably towards 300 mm. Yet I'm under the impression it's performance at 300 improves sensibly at close focus. Servus, Alin
