My understanding is that all auto-focus lenses are more susceptible to fungus and dust because they have to be well vented to keep from putting an extra load on the motor. Keeping a container of desiccant in with your camera gear helps some.
Ciao, Graywolf ---------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Stringer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:41 PM Subject: 24-90 +/- Zoom recommendation > I need a zoom like the FA24-90 but I am not sure if it is the best choice. I have lost my FA28-70 to fungus. Bought another on ebay but it came to me with a fungus. Now I think maybe they are susceptible. > > I have a damaged FA28-105 power zoom model that took great photos but it is bulky. I have almost always used Pentax lens but maybe there is a non Pentax that is good. I will use it on a ZX5n. > > I want to include 35mm in my photography but I find myself using a digital camera and MF camera, leaving the 35mm behind. I have the prime lens, a lot of A lens, M lens, MX body... I think I am having an identity crisis regarding 35mm. The istD would be a solution but I don't want to jump into digital that deep until I see where Pentax's digital lineup is heading. > > Right now just a useful lens for my ZX5n would be okay. I think this body with no battery pack and a small lightweight lens would get some use. > > Thanks for the help. > > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.514 / Virus Database: 312 - Release Date: 8/28/03
