> > I didn't think it was possible to make a firm judgment about resolution > by looking a resolution charts on the web. Not only that, but I don't > normally go around taking pictures of resolution charts in every day > shoots.
The main objection to web-based comparisons doesn't apply here; all the tests in question were carried out by the same site, so we can expect to see similar methodology, post-exposure manipulation, etc. The second point remains valid, though. Under normal shooting conditions for many of us there will be other factors that have a bigger influence.
