Be careful with the 5000s, though... I've seen more of those come back for repair than any other digital we've sold. Ditto with out-of-the-box failures. Nikon seems to have improved the 5400, but I've had nothing but bad experiences with several 5000s. YMMV, of course.
chris On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Herb Chong wrote: > i would recommend the 5000 over the 5400 unless he needs the extra zoom. the > color is a bit better and higher ISO max. > > Herb.... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anand DHUPKAR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:51 PM > Subject: Re: Should I go Canon digital? > > > > Are you sure you want an SLR ? > > Are you sure you want to add on lenses ? > > Analyze your requirements and if you feel that you might not need to > change > > the lenses, I would strongly suggest Nikon 5400. Its a very very good. I > > bought Nikon 4500 and after a month or so this 5400 came in the market. > > Extrem close-up less than 1 cm, compact, extremely handy, beautiful > > ergonomics are plus points of this equipment. In the category of advanced > > point and shoot, it is substantially faster in focusing as well. I am > sure, > > you won't feel sorry. > > >
