Makes sense.


Mark Roberts wrote:
In the case of stop-down metering in the *ist-D I suspect that money
wasn't as much of a factor as time. Even with the lack of the aperture
simulator, stop-down metering certainly could have been implemented in
software (using the DOF preview) but would have required more software
coding, and the attendant debugging and hardware testing. Given the
lateness of the DSLR project as a whole (just look at how much
complaining there still is about having to wait) it was a predictable
corner to cut simply to get the camera to market quicker.


-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com




Reply via email to