> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1774996&size=lg > > >Geez, you know, Marnie, I like that much much better! You're right, it > brings John (the > guy with the scowl - I was actually a participant, and brought my Spottie > along <g>) away > from the centre, which looks better, and it brings the largest placard into > the centre - I > like it there, draws one into the photograph. > > I like that much, much better too! Better balance, concentrates the story, > even pops the guy with the megaphone out better. That one's a keeper.
You win some contact but loose some of the crowd. Hmmm, I'm not sure... > Glad you found "review" all right, when I saw Dag's I kicked myself. Why? Your suggestion was good. > Now why I can give responses/critiques/whatever in one or two lines? LOL. Too > wordy by half. :-) I had to, I was determined to comment them all, but some of the photos would have deserved more words. Another thing is that a history teacher once guessed that I would study some natural science. Why? Because I had answered all the questions in the first test in his class with one sentence each. My class mates had used one page on each question :-) > Marnie aka Doe Luckily our critiques aren't going to be critiqued. ;-) Perhaps, but it would have been nice if some of them were discussed. DagT (man of too few words ;-)
