Thanks, Herb. I'll suggest that to the photo shop I go to. I can send an image to anyone who's curious. The images just don't stand up to much magnifying. Maybe I expect too much...
One of the jpegs that breaks down on enlargement shows, according to GraphicConverter: Size: 1486 x 1024 pixels, 212 kb, 72 x 72 ppi, 1:28 compression. (that seems to be a lot!) keith Herb Chong wrote: > > sounds like their JPEG compression is set too high. > > Herb.... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 3:39 AM > Subject: Re: OT: Hash marks (was Meow - cat picture) > > > Yes it does. That pretty well describes it. I couldn't come up with the > > mental image, but that about does it. > > Not just one shot. All of them had it. The 4x6" prints from the film did > > not have it. The images on the CD did... > > I used Kodak Royal 200 and 400, which is pretty high definition film. > > In fact, I look at some of my images with a 10X Coddington loupe, and > > the film is clean as can be.
