I hate to say this, but this doesn't necessarily invalidate the original point. Some folks have a hard time changing. I suspect I will have to adjust to the narrower latitude, since I'm now a print shooter. OTOH, I'll get instant feedback, so I hope I'll learn quickly, or at least get the shot on the second try
Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/28/03 11:55PM >>> The latitude is plenty if you know what you're doing. tv > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Funny thing is I know at least a couple of wedding photographers who > have gone back to shooting film. This is because they say > digital just > couldn't cope with the lattitude required for their job. > Bride & Groom > shots either lose detail from the (brides) dress or the > often dark suit > of the groom. They have gone back to negative film for > this reason. I > wonder if more will follow in time... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 28 September 2003 03:40 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: istD test > > > > The pro boys that I know here have done exactly that, though > > not with formal tests, just by shooting pictures and > > comparing, and have dumped their medium format cameras in > > favour of the 6mp digitals. These are wedding shooters > > though, which is not a high resolution game, by any means. > > >
