No problem,Bruce.
I have a few shots left on a roll of Portra 400NC in the 6x7 and
Friday is our horse show banquet,so hopefully my daughter,or some other
willing contestant,will let me take a shot or two then i can scan the results and 
post some were so you, and whom ever else,can see.

Dave        

                                > Dave,
> 
> Thanks for the report.  That is what I was looking for.  That is about
> the same as the 165/2.8.  In order to get just a tight head shot, I
> have to put on a tube.  It would be interesting to know what short
> tele - if any - can produce a tight head shot suitable for portraits.
>  I'm beginning to hunch that it may be the 135 macro.  My new (to me)
>  120 soft will do it, but it is somewhat limited in the type of shot
>  (only soft or well stopped down).  Anyone out there know?
> 
> ---
> Bruce
> 
> 
> Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 4:46:18 AM, you wrote:
> 
> bcin>                 I received my birthday present to my self
> bcin> today.The 6x7 SMC Tak 200 f 4 was on
> bcin> the 
> bcin> kitchen table when i got home from work.Nice shape and an
> bcin> extra front cover.The hood is a
> bcin> bit loose 
> bcin> but it seems to tighten up if i give it a bit of a clock wize twist.
> bcin> Pretty much as described.A few dust particles but there
> bcin> was some marks on the front and i
> bcin> gave it a 
> bcin> light clean with my Henrys lens cloth and its all gone.:-)
> 
> bcin> Hope to try it out this weekend,but its supposed to rain
> bcin> both days.Of course,its Markham
> bcin> Fair 
> bcin> weekend.Its never  nice.lol
> 
> bcin> Bruce,i did a quick line up with my daughter and at min
> bcin> focus,8',i had a head and shoulder
> bcin> shot, that 
> bcin> included part of her chest. Is that what you were interested in????
> 
> 
> bcin> Dave(happy now) Brooks                  
>                               
> 
> 
> 
> 

                                


Reply via email to