Wendy posted: > At 10:49 AM 13/10/2003 -0400, Vic wrote: > >The down side that gets overlooked is the amount of time needed to tweak and > >file all the digital images. > > Have to agree with that. > On the other hand, shooting digital has forced me to catalogue and backup > my shots. I now have a CD (or DVD) in a box file with an index print > showing all the files on the disc. > Shooting film, I'd get a load back from the processors, look through them > and then stack the envelopes neatly on the floor. Periodically the > envelopes would be moved to another spot and re-stacked when it looked like > the pile was about to fall over.
I hear that! Have 8,400+ photos in my Photoshop Album catalogue. The vast majority are digital images. All the digital images I've kept are easy to find -- they're stored on CD-Rs in numerical order. Most of my negatives and slides are nicely filed, by year, in binders. Find prints though .... Ha!
