Rob Brigham wrote: > [. . .] > BTW anyone wondering about the noise in my sample pics for this test - > it was shot at 1600ISO!! I notice reducing the exposure in the RAW > software actually made the noise a lot better too, something that again > the jpg adjustments couldn't do - and not something I expected.
Seems to me, anytime you feel you have to or want to resort to an ISO of 1600, a little noise is a very minor price to pay, especially if there's a relatively simple way to reduce it. 1600 ISP with a digital... marvelous! <g> keith
