On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:08:26 +0100 "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think so, but it is confusing the hell out of me at the moment. I
just don't see how they could have got this so wrong?!? How could they
realise it was worth compensating, then compensate the wrong way?
Surely I am missing something?
Mind you, it shouldn't matter if the flash FOV is wider than the area
covered by the sensor on the camera - just means less range than would
have otherwise been possible.
Pardon my intrusion, but with __digital__ camera, isn't it just a matter of simple experiment?! Take a piece of newspaper, hang it on the wall. Make sure room is dark. Make sure the 'paper fills most of the frame. Take a shot, look at it closely. Repeat, for various focal lengths?!
Or I'm totally out of my mind again?
Boris
_____ "Антивирус Касперского Personal Pro + Антихакер по специальной цене $85" http://www.kaspersky.ru/offer/
