That would make sense, but I am sure the flash head reads 58mm when I
have my 24-90 at 90mm.  This agrees with the chart, but not with what
you/Wylwester/I think it should work.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 22 October 2003 18:06
> To: Rob Brigham
> Subject: Re[2]: Flash on *istD
> 
> 
> Rob,
> 
> Back when I had some AF360FGZ's, I find a setting on them to 
> tell them what kind of film format was being used - 35, 645, 
> 67.  By setting that, the zoom head on the flash would show 
> correct focal length for the format being used (85mm on 35, 
> 165 on 67).  My hunch is that they just have the columns that 
> you are viewing reversed.  Basically, if you are shooting 
> with a 55-58mm on the *ist D, the zoom head on the flash 
> should be at 85. Does that make sense?  Works pretty well for 
> me because I was switching back and forth between 35mm and 67.
> 
> ---
> Bruce
> 
> 
> Wednesday, October 22, 2003, 9:08:26 AM, you wrote:
> 
> RB> I think so, but it is confusing the hell out of me at the 
> moment.  I 
> RB> just don't see how they could have got this so wrong?!?  
> How could 
> RB> they realise it was worth compensating, then compensate the wrong 
> RB> way? Surely I am missing something?
> 
> RB> Mind you, it shouldn't matter if the flash FOV is wider than the 
> RB> area covered by the sensor on the camera - just means less range 
> RB> than would have otherwise been possible.
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: 22 October 2003 17:01
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: Flash on *istD
> >> 
> >> 
> >> on 22.10.03 17:22, Rob Brigham at 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> 
> >> > To me it looks like Pentax have got it wrong. A 24mm lens
> >> on the istD
> >> > should require a flash angle equivalent to a 35mm lens.
> >> I think Rob it is not wrong. The values shown, shows rather
> >> field of coverage of the flash. Thus 85mm flash coverage will 
> >> cover field of view of 58mm lens on APS-sized-CCD camera 
> >> (which is equal to field of view of 85mm lenns on 35mm 
> >> camera). So, zoom head in AF360FGZ is able to cover at max. 
> >> telephoto setting field of view of 58mm lens on *istD. Am I right?
> >> 
> >> --
> >> Best Regards
> >> Sylwek
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to