[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MS wrote: > >Aside from that, slide film will be slow to depart. Damn sure I will > >not be going to digital, without my LX filled and latterly developed >> with slide film for the Christmas annual show. I like the >> inconvenience of the big screen going up....
> Maybe I've already read this here and don't remember it. Been > lots of discussion how many labs can now do digital printing > (well, a limited few). > > And I think there has been some discussion that one can get > their jpegs (or > whatever) converted into film. Hasn't there? Or am I > remembering incorrectly? > > Can jpegs be converted into slides? Yet? If not yet, is it > forseeably doable? Interesting replies on this and pleased to see digital images can be made into slides. What I clumsily tried to convey (whilst in, and still in pain - I tore some muscles in an accident) is that no matter what digital can offer for instant results and film cost saving, the annual slide show in the Smith household is not going to disappear. I am delighted that the new and excellent *ist D can also offer images which can be transferred to slide. I will most certainly be buying my first new Pentax camera very shortly; but I suspect that slide film in an LX will still do 99% of the Christmas shows. As a matter of interest, are there any dual 35mm/MF projectors made? This year I have some slides from my 67 to show too. Malcolm
