I suppose that's not such a horrible thing for a rangefinder, though. Lots of RF folks don't routinely shoot longer than a 90mm. Almost never longer than 135mm. Wider than 28mm is quite routine, though.
But on the whole, for a rangefinder, the 28-90 (35mm equivalent) range ain't all that bad.
I think that camera will do very well, once released...
cheers, frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: I have seen the istD... Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 11:54:06 -0500
Ah ha! A digital camera with analog controls. What a quaint idea! I like all that manual capability. I wonder how big the sensor is, and how much it is going to cost?
However, I doubt that it has interchangeable lenses. And note that it says 28-90mm equivalent lens, not 28-90mm lens.
Cotty wrote:
This what you mean ?
<http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/news/articles/story_440.html>
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are, you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
