Rob wrote: >On 5 Nov 2003 at 17:21, Mark Erickson wrote: > >> All, >> >> Check out this posting over at photo.net: >> >> http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006R06 >> >> Interesting.... > >Laughable, so they can't produce a FF 35mm DSLR for under 6k but they are >aiming to produce a FF 645 for under 3k. They'll have the market sown up given >what everyone else is charging for FF 645 digi-backs :-) > >Rob Studdert
It is kind of odd, isn't it? Seems like Pentax would want to get in the game to stop current 645 users from defecting to other systems. Just matching the Kodak or Fuji digital back price would put them in decent competitive shape, wouldn't it? Anyone know how MF digital back sales compare to 35mm (and smaller) Digital SLR sales? --Mark
