creates. You want full control over yer photography? Shoot film, and go play in the dark. Wanna do colour? Lets not limit ourselves here. Devote a hundred and fifty square feet of your home to it, and go spend some money filling it with noisey equipment and smelly fluids. Some are even carcinogenic, and they come packaged with really cool chemicals that will take it into your body right through your skin. Sure, you can scan film, which gives you some control, but is a bastard solution at best, neither getting the best out of film, nor out of digitization. This ain't a Pentax issue, this is photography. Or whats left of it once the computers are done with it.
>William Robb Well, yeah, sure. And I've been a stronger supporter of digital for longer than you. But I also think some of us are entitled to want it to be better before dropping big bucks. I also believe in getting second/third generation. But I am not saying that it stinks now. :-) Home printing really does save a great deal of bother. At least one can get it the way one wants. And not having to scan, would mean no dust I presume. Which is a big headache. But post processing *could* become more of a burden than a boon. Really, William, us butting heads on this particular issue is amusing. Actually. Marnie aka Doe Hehehe. (Something bounced. Think it was this message, if not, and it appears twice, sorry.)
