Ok, so the first test ( a 10-second exposure) didn't show anything.  I
tested again, this time 2 minutes, and got a bunch.  Luckily they don't show
up except for very long exposures....

Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: Hot pixels


> On 10 Nov 2003 at 21:23, Christian Skofteland wrote:
>
> > Hmmmm, my first ist-D had one hot pixel almost dead-center.  The new one
> > doesn't seem to have any.
>
> I've never seen a sensor that had no defects. Have a peek at the page
listed
> below, it contain preliminary details of a camera for telescope imaging
based
> on the same sensor as used in the *ist D. Of interest is the following
passage
> in the preliminary specs:
>
> "CCD quality: Grade 1 or better - No bad columns, no dead pixels, no more
than
> 50 'hot' pixels (saturated in <10 seconds)."
>
> http://www.starlight-xpress.co.uk/SXV-M25.htm
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
>

Reply via email to