> > Excellent points. > If none of these things were operator-adjustable, all the talk about > them would be academic. Learning for learning's sake.
Not that there's anything wrong with that. If you look at Boz's K-mount pages you'll find them full of facts that were put together, mostly by PDML members, but which are mostly learning for learnings sake. Which of us, after all, is going to even modify the contacts on the back of a lens, let alone try anything more radical? (OK, Cotty - you can put your hand down. Anybody *else*?)
