I think you missed the point. I didn't judge her, but, rather, looked at the various possibilities that may have existed in her life, and in mine, as well. It was musing, not judging ... exploring possibilities.
I believe we can all agree that a photograph should make the viewer think. Should it not give the photographer a reason to think as well? shel graywolf wrote: > What bothers me, Shel is the judgments you expressed about the woman. Without > them it is just a photo of her. With them it is a serious put down. This is the > thing one has to watch for using such photos editorially. If you imply, much > less say something (in this case that she is unhealthy) about the subject that > is not necessarily true then it is probably actionable, and to me objectionable. > > -
