Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>Three people I care about have serious weight problems, it's killing them,
none of them are comfortable with having their picture taken. The all hate it.
So I may have an extra reason for being disturbed by the picture.

I have felt much better once I knew Shel did not really hide the camera. 

Your issues with fat are your issues with fat. They are not mine. I am with 
Graywolf here, some people are jumping to the conclusion this woman is pathetic 
simply by her existence (of being fat), and therefore one shouldn't take her 
picture. 

I, personally, find all kinds of bodies interesting. Maybe because of the 
nude drawing I have done.

There might be considered to be some editorializing with the camera, or there 
might not. OTOH, it's just a picture of a woman clutching a coke in a fast 
food joint, if you remove your own emotional content. A pose, I am sure, many of 
us have been in (clutching a drink or a hamburger in a fast food joint.)

I fail to see why she should have any more a flattering candid picture taken 
than anyone else who is captured by someone doing "street photography." 

More flattering a picture than someone would take of me in the same 
situation, for instance. Why should she have special status? Because she's "pathetic?" 
I don't jump to that conclusion, sorry.

Would it be okay for someone to take a candid of me smoking on the street? 
Would that picture be objectionable because lots have died indirectly from 
smoking?

Life is life, it's not all flattering or attractive to others.

Marnie aka Doe 

Reply via email to