Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote: > > Bob Walkden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20010716.html > > http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20031016.html > > > > Treat them as self-cancelling polarities.
Well, what do you call it if neither cancels the other? Hmmm. > Thanks for the URLs -- and yes, whackos like those two can be very > entertaining, but should not be considered politically relevant. What "two?" The authors of SpinSanity's articles? Whackos? "...politically revelant?" So far, I do see care exhibited by SpinSanity to (in accordance with their platform promises) be equally complete (n on-partisan) in revealing untruths, and inequities in statements by public figures. I still see both authors as potential fire-starters (= inflammatory rhetoric) of an ultra-liberal bent, but after carefully listening to (reading) their individual diatribes, I must admit, they gave me food for thought. . . All this is quite academic, if you didn't mean those two authors! <g> keith > > Suggestion: the sig. part of an email is like an "e-Speakers' Corner", > > where anything goes. We ought to resist the temptation to reply. > > Yup, that's the traditional way to see it. > > -tih > -- > Tom Ivar Helbekkmoe
