On 6/12/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Recently at ImagingUSA2003 in Las Vegas, Gary Rogers of R9 (the brains
>behind Septone) showed us one of the workflows for Grayscale conversion of
>RGB images that he uses. We found it to be far superior to the standard
>conversion and thought it would be helpful to share it.
>Step 1. Flatten Image
>Step 2. Create New Hue/Saturation Adjustment Layer with the following
>properties:
>Mode: Saturation
>Hue: -180
>Saturation: -100
>Lightness: +100
>Step 3. Convert to LAB Color. Choose the Flatten Option if given.
>Step 4. Open the Channels Window and delete Channels 'A' and 'B'
>Step 5. Convert to Grayscale.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>Hi Cotty,

Hi,

>I didn't understand the step 2:

It's alright mate, neither did I.

>
>What is the difference of use a new adjustment layer as saturation mode
>and put the
>saturation at -180 AND use Ctrl+Shift+U (Desaturate) at once? I'm asking
>this 'cause if we
>set a layer as 'saturation mode', we only manage the saturation. So,
>don't matter what we
>do w/ other controls, like hue and lightness 'cause layer is only for
>saturation.
>
>I've made a test w/ Hue/Sat. layer (as shown here) and a Desaturate + Lab
>color (Channel
>lightness) and the result is the same.

Doesn't surprise me at all. In fact I only used the above method once but
for all the work it took, I tried a similar shot desaturated and then
adjusted in curves and it was just as nice, so frankly I can't be
bothered with all the messing around ;-)

>[]'s,
>Carlos




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   |      People, Places, Pastiche
||=====|      www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_____________________________
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk

Reply via email to