Butch Black wrote:
> Gentlemen, (and I use the term loosely)
> A 645 based camera with a 24x36mm sensor would have approximately
> a 1.5 magnification factor over a 645 negative, not a 35mm negative.
> So the 400mm 645 lens would look like a 600mm lens on a 645 negative.
... my point all along
> This would also give you approximately the same image as a 400mm
> lens on 35mm film or a 24x36 sensor on a 35mm based DSLR.
I did not assume that the person also had a fullframe DSLR
and a 35mm based 400mm lens, rather that he/she would be
using alternate 645 bodies - standard & one w/ the 24x36mm
sensor. That the digital 645 and the 35mm DSLR, each w/ a
24x36mm sensor, were the objects being compared seems to be
where all this has gone awry despite my fumbling attempts to
make this clear.
Bill
"... a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest"
B. Dylan
---------------------------------------------------------
Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------
