Yep, it works: I have been doing this for some time now and it is a good interim solution. And the lab I use scans slides as well if you order the processing done (in a different lab) so that the film is left uncut. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: John Coyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 26. joulukuuta 2003 2:48 Aihe: Re: A quick *ist D comment. >Both Shel and Malcolm have not mentioned the combination of film and digital >which I find most convenient - shoot on film and have it scanned at the time >of development. I may be lucky in having a very high-quality one-hour lab >within two minutes drive (or ten-minutes walking!) of where I both live and >work, but I would urge those who want the best of both to seek out such a >lab. I will probably get the *ist D (or it's successor) within the next >twelve months, but at the moment I don't need to have a digital camera in >order to have good quality scans available of every frame I shoot (in colour >negative, anyway) very quickly. <snip> >John Coyle >Brisbane, Australia
