I'm using both the 360FGZ and the AF400T. I haven't shot enough frames to be sure, but so far, I have found that the 360FGZ seems a bit inconsistent in exposure. Seems that when I zoom in, underexposure occurs, but when zoomed out to a wider setting, the exposure seems about right.
On the AF400T, it seems to be just a bit of overexposure. 1/2 to 1 stop. Setting exposure compensation seemed to fix it up just fine. I'll be doing some more tests and I'll post my findings. -- Best regards, Bruce Sunday, December 28, 2003, 8:16:37 AM, you wrote: WR> ----- Original Message ----- WR> From: "Bill Owens" WR> Subject: Re: it arrived >> I sometimes have the same problem with the AF360. Probably 1/3 to 1/2 of WR> my >> flash photos are underexposed enough to be objectionable. I'm going to WR> try >> center weighted metering instead of matrix, and if that doesn't cure the >> problem, I'll try autoflash instead of TTL flash. It seems to occur >> randomly and so far I haven't been able find any consistent reason, such WR> as >> focal length, distance to subject etc. that causes it to occur on a WR> regular >> basis. WR> I'm using the old analogue SCA adaptor with the Metz 60 CT-2 and if WR> anything, it seems to over expose very slightly. A minor adjustment of WR> exposure compensation (1/3 stop) seems to bring everything back in nicely WR> though. WR> William Robb
