did you shoot in RAW? if you did, you could convert to TIFF with exposure compensation of -1 and gotten more out of the *istD. that's how the camera works and one of the reasons why i shoot RAW unless i have no choice. it gives me one more stop to play with before the highlights saturate.
Herb.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pieter Nagel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 12:24 PM Subject: Re: Dynamic Range > Tell me about it. Just today I was looking at a digital picture with blown > highlights, and severely wishing it had been shot on film for this one > reason. Quarter of a face was filled with 4095,4095,4095 RGB. No amount of > gammacurving or leveladjustment was gonna open up those pixels into > different shades.
