I don't think the mount is crippled. I think the K and M lenses are crippled for not having the "A" setting! ;-)
Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 1:48 PM Subject: Re: AP liked the *ist 35mm best > You're right, John, > > We should call it a "differently-abled mount". Or maybe a "special mount". > > I'm starting to feel better about it already... > > <vbg> > > -frank (on his lawyer's advice) > > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist > fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer > > > > > >From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: AP liked the *ist 35mm best > >Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 12:59:06 -0500 (EST) > > > > > > > > On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Mark Roberts wrote: > > > > > > > Pity it's (like all film cameras) being overshadowed by things > >digital. > > > > > > Pity, also, that it's a cripple mount. > > > >It doesn't matter how many times you use that stupid description; > >Pentax aren't going to change how their cameras work. > > > >So why not just stop the childish name-calling?
